Add personalized voting to any account.
iconik makes it easy to apply your firm’s policy, meet individual client mandates, and separate signal from noise.
Stackable policies.
Combine different policies to open up a range of possibilities, with conflicts resolved according to the order of precedence you’ve set. Only on iconik.
- Client’s own rulesChecked first
- Shareholder Protections policyChecked if rule 1 has no position
- Default: vote with the boardCatches everything else
- Shareholder proposal: independent board chairFORDecided by 1 · Client’s own rules
- Advisory vote on executive compensationAGAINSTDecided by 1 · Client’s own rules
- Shareholder proposal: lower threshold to call a special meetingFORDecided by 2 · Shareholder Protections policy
- Ratification of auditorsFORDecided by 3 · Default
Write voting rules with precision.
For full control of the voting engine, build your own rules using if/else logic.
- IF
- Proposal is Say-on-Pay
- AND
- CEO pay is more than 170× the median employee
- THEN
- Vote againstand against compensation committee members
- ELSE
- Pass to the next policy in the stack
Focus on the votes that matter to you.
To review or stay informed about certain types of votes, set alerts by company, topic, or shareholder proponent.
- CompanyFedEx
- TopicHealth
- ProponentJohn Chevedden
- Company · FedEx2026 Annual Meeting posted. 16 proposals, votes due September 27.
- Topic · HealthReport on risks related to distributing abortion drugs, proposed by the Catholic Diocese of Fort Worth.
- Proponent · John CheveddenLower threshold to call a special meeting.
A report for every meeting, for every account.
See how each ballot item was voted, where the vote differed from management, and which topics drove the result.
- Votes cast
- 16
- Differ from management (63%)
- 10
- Compensation10/10
- Independence9/9
- Governance6/9
- Health2/6
- Shareholder rights2/2
- CEO pay ratio above the limitClient’s own rules
- Say-on-Pay: against
- Ellison: against
- Griffith: against
- Schwab: against
- Walsh: against
- Chair of nominating committee not independentClient’s own rules
- Ellison: against
- Griffith: against
- Perpall: against
- Walsh: against
- Board less than 40% gender diverseClient’s own rules
- Ellison: against
- Griffith: against
- Perpall: against
- Walsh: against
- Director tenure of 9 years or moreClient’s own rules
- Ellison: against
- Ramo: against
- Schwab: against
- Walsh: against
- Board chair is not independentClient’s own rules
- Martin: against
- Independent chair proposal: for
- Proponent: John CheveddenShareholder Protections policy
- Special meeting threshold: for
- Reproductive healthClient’s own rules
- Health report: against
- No rule applied: vote with the boardDefault
- Edmunds: for
- Norton: for
- Smith: for
- Subramaniam: for
- Auditors: for
Customize voting, even when voting rights are combined.
Master and omnibus accounts pool voting rights, so every client is voted the same way. VoteThru calculates each underlying account’s share of the vote, so each client can follow its own policy, or the firm’s policy by default.
Live in two steps.
Instruct your custodian to deliver proxies to iconik.
Ballots then arrive automatically for every meeting. For master and omnibus accounts, add a feed of underlying positions so VoteThru can split the vote.
iconik confirms receipt. The account is onboarded.
View voting activity for all of your accounts in the Adviser Dashboard.